Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal regarding implementation of a resolution plan under IBC. The tribunal held that regulatory approvals were not obtained within the statutory one-year timeline prescribed under Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the resolution plan's approval on 03.02.2022, the required regulatory clearances remained pending beyond the prescribed period. The court emphasized that the statutory authority's inability to secure approvals does not absolve it from the mandatory timeline. Consequently, the tribunal found sufficient grounds to proceed with liquidation proceedings, upholding the lower court's order and rejecting the appellant's prayer for direction to implement the resolution plan.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal regarding implementation of a resolution plan under IBC. The tribunal held that regulatory approvals were not obtained within the statutory one-year timeline prescribed under Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the resolution plan's approval on 03.02.2022, the required regulatory clearances remained pending beyond the prescribed period. The court emphasized that the statutory authority's inability to secure approvals does not absolve it from the mandatory timeline. Consequently, the tribunal found sufficient grounds to proceed with liquidation proceedings, upholding the lower court's order and rejecting the appellant's prayer for direction to implement the resolution plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.