<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Resolution Plan Invalidated as Regulatory Approvals Exceed Statutory One-Year Timeline Under IBC Section 31(4)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88973</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal regarding implementation of a resolution plan under IBC. The tribunal held that regulatory approvals were not obtained within the statutory one-year timeline prescribed under Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the resolution plan&#039;s approval on 03.02.2022, the required regulatory clearances remained pending beyond the prescribed period. The court emphasized that the statutory authority&#039;s inability to secure approvals does not absolve it from the mandatory timeline. Consequently, the tribunal found sufficient grounds to proceed with liquidation proceedings, upholding the lower court&#039;s order and rejecting the appellant&#039;s prayer for direction to implement the resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=826096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Resolution Plan Invalidated as Regulatory Approvals Exceed Statutory One-Year Timeline Under IBC Section 31(4)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88973</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal regarding implementation of a resolution plan under IBC. The tribunal held that regulatory approvals were not obtained within the statutory one-year timeline prescribed under Section 31(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Despite the resolution plan&#039;s approval on 03.02.2022, the required regulatory clearances remained pending beyond the prescribed period. The court emphasized that the statutory authority&#039;s inability to secure approvals does not absolve it from the mandatory timeline. Consequently, the tribunal found sufficient grounds to proceed with liquidation proceedings, upholding the lower court&#039;s order and rejecting the appellant&#039;s prayer for direction to implement the resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 08:34:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>