Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT determined appellant's property was proceeds of crime under PMLA, arising from NSEL fraud scheme. Evidence established appellant's spouse was a senior NSEL executive involved in systematic financial manipulation, with property purchased using fraudulently obtained consultancy charges. Despite appellant's claims of legitimate income, the tribunal found her defense unsubstantiated and concluded the property was directly linked to criminal proceeds. The tribunal rejected appellant's arguments regarding property valuation and lack of predicate offense chargesheet, confirming full property attachment. Appeal was consequently dismissed, upholding the original attachment order.
AT determined appellant's property was proceeds of crime under PMLA, arising from NSEL fraud scheme. Evidence established appellant's spouse was a senior NSEL executive involved in systematic financial manipulation, with property purchased using fraudulently obtained consultancy charges. Despite appellant's claims of legitimate income, the tribunal found her defense unsubstantiated and concluded the property was directly linked to criminal proceeds. The tribunal rejected appellant's arguments regarding property valuation and lack of predicate offense chargesheet, confirming full property attachment. Appeal was consequently dismissed, upholding the original attachment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.