Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, with the Appellate Authority empowered to comprehensively examine the input tax credit (ITC) claim and determine the validity of the original demand order. The petitioner remains bound by the appellate determination, subject to available legal recourse.
HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, with the Appellate Authority empowered to comprehensively examine the input tax credit (ITC) claim and determine the validity of the original demand order. The petitioner remains bound by the appellate determination, subject to available legal recourse.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
