<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Demand Upheld: Procedural Gaps Noted, Petitioner Directed to Pursue Appellate Remedies Under Section 107 of CGST Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88919</link>
    <description>HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, with the Appellate Authority empowered to comprehensively examine the input tax credit (ITC) claim and determine the validity of the original demand order. The petitioner remains bound by the appellate determination, subject to available legal recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Demand Upheld: Procedural Gaps Noted, Petitioner Directed to Pursue Appellate Remedies Under Section 107 of CGST Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88919</link>
      <description>HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, with the Appellate Authority empowered to comprehensively examine the input tax credit (ITC) claim and determine the validity of the original demand order. The petitioner remains bound by the appellate determination, subject to available legal recourse.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 08:55:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>