Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, with the Appellate Authority empowered to comprehensively examine the input tax credit (ITC) claim and determine the validity of the original demand order. The petitioner remains bound by the appellate determination, subject to available legal recourse.
HC dismisses petition challenging tax demand, finding procedural irregularities in the original order but declining to remand the matter. The court held that the Adjudicating Authority did not fully comply with previous judicial directions and natural justice principles. However, the petitioner is directed to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, with the Appellate Authority empowered to comprehensively examine the input tax credit (ITC) claim and determine the validity of the original demand order. The petitioner remains bound by the appellate determination, subject to available legal recourse.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
