Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT held that booking cancellation charges are not service consideration but damages for contract breach. Cancellation charges collected by the dealer do not constitute a service element and are not taxable under service tax regulations. The tribunal referenced prior case law establishing that such charges represent compensation for contract non-performance, not service provision. Commission received from financial institutions was determined to be revenue neutral. Consequently, the service tax demand, including interest and penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. The appellant's appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
CESTAT held that booking cancellation charges are not service consideration but damages for contract breach. Cancellation charges collected by the dealer do not constitute a service element and are not taxable under service tax regulations. The tribunal referenced prior case law establishing that such charges represent compensation for contract non-performance, not service provision. Commission received from financial institutions was determined to be revenue neutral. Consequently, the service tax demand, including interest and penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. The appellant's appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
