Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT held that booking cancellation charges are not service consideration but damages for contract breach. Cancellation charges collected by the dealer do not constitute a service element and are not taxable under service tax regulations. The tribunal referenced prior case law establishing that such charges represent compensation for contract non-performance, not service provision. Commission received from financial institutions was determined to be revenue neutral. Consequently, the service tax demand, including interest and penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. The appellant's appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
CESTAT held that booking cancellation charges are not service consideration but damages for contract breach. Cancellation charges collected by the dealer do not constitute a service element and are not taxable under service tax regulations. The tribunal referenced prior case law establishing that such charges represent compensation for contract non-performance, not service provision. Commission received from financial institutions was determined to be revenue neutral. Consequently, the service tax demand, including interest and penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. The appellant's appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
