Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT adjudicated a transfer pricing dispute regarding the omission of section 92BA clause (i) by Finance Act, 2017, effective 01.04.2017. The tribunal determined that since the reference to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was made post-04.2017, the omitted clause cannot be invoked. Consistent with prior ITAT bench rulings, the tribunal held that the deleted statutory provision should be considered as never having been part of the statute. Consequently, no transfer pricing adjustments can be made for domestic specified transactions. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively invalidating the transfer pricing reference as legally unsustainable under the amended statutory framework.
ITAT adjudicated a transfer pricing dispute regarding the omission of section 92BA clause (i) by Finance Act, 2017, effective 01.04.2017. The tribunal determined that since the reference to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was made post-04.2017, the omitted clause cannot be invoked. Consistent with prior ITAT bench rulings, the tribunal held that the deleted statutory provision should be considered as never having been part of the statute. Consequently, no transfer pricing adjustments can be made for domestic specified transactions. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively invalidating the transfer pricing reference as legally unsustainable under the amended statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
