Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT adjudicated a transfer pricing dispute regarding the omission of section 92BA clause (i) by Finance Act, 2017, effective 01.04.2017. The tribunal determined that since the reference to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was made post-04.2017, the omitted clause cannot be invoked. Consistent with prior ITAT bench rulings, the tribunal held that the deleted statutory provision should be considered as never having been part of the statute. Consequently, no transfer pricing adjustments can be made for domestic specified transactions. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively invalidating the transfer pricing reference as legally unsustainable under the amended statutory framework.
ITAT adjudicated a transfer pricing dispute regarding the omission of section 92BA clause (i) by Finance Act, 2017, effective 01.04.2017. The tribunal determined that since the reference to Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was made post-04.2017, the omitted clause cannot be invoked. Consistent with prior ITAT bench rulings, the tribunal held that the deleted statutory provision should be considered as never having been part of the statute. Consequently, no transfer pricing adjustments can be made for domestic specified transactions. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively invalidating the transfer pricing reference as legally unsustainable under the amended statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
