Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the delay of 2659 days in filing the appeal was unjustifiable and beyond the statutorily prescribed 90-day limitation period. The tribunal held that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the extensive delay, noting a lack of diligence in tracking proceedings and missing critical procedural timelines. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility to maintain procedural punctuality and timely pursue legal remedies within the prescribed statutory framework.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the delay of 2659 days in filing the appeal was unjustifiable and beyond the statutorily prescribed 90-day limitation period. The tribunal held that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the extensive delay, noting a lack of diligence in tracking proceedings and missing critical procedural timelines. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility to maintain procedural punctuality and timely pursue legal remedies within the prescribed statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
