Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT Decision Summary: The ITAT comprehensively allowed multiple tax-related claims for the assessee, including: (a) validating internal CUP benchmarking for interest on advances to associated enterprises, (b) rejecting notional interest adjustments on outstanding receivables, (c) permitting weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) for R&D expenditure, (d) upholding depreciation on goodwill from intra-group amalgamation, (e) deleting disallowances related to common expense allocation, (f) rejecting interest capitalization disallowance under section 36(1)(iii), (g) dismissing section 14A disallowance, and (h) upholding non-deduction of TDS on non-resident commission. The tribunal consistently followed precedential rulings and applied principles of commercial reality, predominantly deciding in favor of the assessee across multiple tax dispute grounds.
ITAT Decision Summary: The ITAT comprehensively allowed multiple tax-related claims for the assessee, including: (a) validating internal CUP benchmarking for interest on advances to associated enterprises, (b) rejecting notional interest adjustments on outstanding receivables, (c) permitting weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) for R&D expenditure, (d) upholding depreciation on goodwill from intra-group amalgamation, (e) deleting disallowances related to common expense allocation, (f) rejecting interest capitalization disallowance under section 36(1)(iii), (g) dismissing section 14A disallowance, and (h) upholding non-deduction of TDS on non-resident commission. The tribunal consistently followed precedential rulings and applied principles of commercial reality, predominantly deciding in favor of the assessee across multiple tax dispute grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.