Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Multiple Tax Claims Upheld: Complex Benchmarking and Deduction Validations Favor Assessee Under Sections 35(2AB), 36(1)(iii), and 14A

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT Decision Summary: The ITAT comprehensively allowed multiple tax-related claims for the assessee, including: (a) validating internal CUP benchmarking for interest on advances to associated enterprises, (b) rejecting notional interest adjustments on outstanding receivables, (c) permitting weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) for R&D expenditure, (d) upholding depreciation on goodwill from intra-group amalgamation, (e) deleting disallowances related to common expense allocation, (f) rejecting interest capitalization disallowance under section 36(1)(iii), (g) dismissing section 14A disallowance, and (h) upholding non-deduction of TDS on non-resident commission. The tribunal consistently followed precedential rulings and applied principles of commercial reality, predominantly deciding in favor of the assessee across multiple tax dispute grounds.....