Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
ITAT adjudicated multiple taxation issues involving property-related income and interest deductions. The tribunal held that: (1) reassessment notice issued to a non-existing entity was null and void, quashing the re-assessment order; (2) pre-construction interest deduction under Section 24(b) was allowable for the entire Rs. 30 Crore loan utilized for property acquisition, rejecting proportionate disallowance; (3) maintenance charges from lessees were correctly classified as business income; and (4) loan substitution for property acquisition was acceptable, permitting interest deduction when nexus between loan and property was established. The tribunal ultimately confirmed the lower appellate authority's order in favor of the assessee.
ITAT adjudicated multiple taxation issues involving property-related income and interest deductions. The tribunal held that: (1) reassessment notice issued to a non-existing entity was null and void, quashing the re-assessment order; (2) pre-construction interest deduction under Section 24(b) was allowable for the entire Rs. 30 Crore loan utilized for property acquisition, rejecting proportionate disallowance; (3) maintenance charges from lessees were correctly classified as business income; and (4) loan substitution for property acquisition was acceptable, permitting interest deduction when nexus between loan and property was established. The tribunal ultimately confirmed the lower appellate authority's order in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.