<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Property Income Tax Battle: Loan Interest, Reassessment, and Maintenance Charges Resolved Under Section 24(b)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88708</link>
    <description>ITAT adjudicated multiple taxation issues involving property-related income and interest deductions. The tribunal held that: (1) reassessment notice issued to a non-existing entity was null and void, quashing the re-assessment order; (2) pre-construction interest deduction under Section 24(b) was allowable for the entire Rs. 30 Crore loan utilized for property acquisition, rejecting proportionate disallowance; (3) maintenance charges from lessees were correctly classified as business income; and (4) loan substitution for property acquisition was acceptable, permitting interest deduction when nexus between loan and property was established. The tribunal ultimately confirmed the lower appellate authority&#039;s order in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:00:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:00:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=824169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Property Income Tax Battle: Loan Interest, Reassessment, and Maintenance Charges Resolved Under Section 24(b)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88708</link>
      <description>ITAT adjudicated multiple taxation issues involving property-related income and interest deductions. The tribunal held that: (1) reassessment notice issued to a non-existing entity was null and void, quashing the re-assessment order; (2) pre-construction interest deduction under Section 24(b) was allowable for the entire Rs. 30 Crore loan utilized for property acquisition, rejecting proportionate disallowance; (3) maintenance charges from lessees were correctly classified as business income; and (4) loan substitution for property acquisition was acceptable, permitting interest deduction when nexus between loan and property was established. The tribunal ultimately confirmed the lower appellate authority&#039;s order in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:00:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>