Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
ITAT adjudicated multiple taxation issues involving property-related income and interest deductions. The tribunal held that: (1) reassessment notice issued to a non-existing entity was null and void, quashing the re-assessment order; (2) pre-construction interest deduction under Section 24(b) was allowable for the entire Rs. 30 Crore loan utilized for property acquisition, rejecting proportionate disallowance; (3) maintenance charges from lessees were correctly classified as business income; and (4) loan substitution for property acquisition was acceptable, permitting interest deduction when nexus between loan and property was established. The tribunal ultimately confirmed the lower appellate authority's order in favor of the assessee.
ITAT adjudicated multiple taxation issues involving property-related income and interest deductions. The tribunal held that: (1) reassessment notice issued to a non-existing entity was null and void, quashing the re-assessment order; (2) pre-construction interest deduction under Section 24(b) was allowable for the entire Rs. 30 Crore loan utilized for property acquisition, rejecting proportionate disallowance; (3) maintenance charges from lessees were correctly classified as business income; and (4) loan substitution for property acquisition was acceptable, permitting interest deduction when nexus between loan and property was established. The tribunal ultimately confirmed the lower appellate authority's order in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.