Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
HC dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial court and appellate court, determining that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption regarding cheque issuance. The defense witnesses' testimonies were found unreliable, and no credible evidence was presented to challenge the loan transaction. The court concluded that the accused did not establish his defense on preponderance of probabilities, thereby maintaining the original conviction and sentence.
HC dismissed the revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the concurrent findings of the trial court and appellate court, determining that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption regarding cheque issuance. The defense witnesses' testimonies were found unreliable, and no credible evidence was presented to challenge the loan transaction. The court concluded that the accused did not establish his defense on preponderance of probabilities, thereby maintaining the original conviction and sentence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
