Handicraft job work receives concessional GST only for registered principals and predominantly handmade goods; commercial resin articles remain taxabl...
Reassessment disclosure requirements permit stated reasons without revealing information sources, but prior-taxation claims require full examination b...
Independent assessment discretion and corroborated electronic evidence determine validity of on-money additions and undisclosed-consideration assessme...
ITAT allowed partial appeal regarding tax depreciation and expenditure deductions. The tribunal permitted depreciation on non-compete agreement payment as an intangible asset under Section 32(1)(ii), allowing the appellant's claim. Disallowance under Section 14A was set aside, finding the retrospective amendment inapplicable. Appeals related to rights issue expenditure and MAT credit were dismissed. The tribunal rejected disallowance of belated ESI and Labour Welfare Fund remittance, aligning with precedent judicial interpretation. Overall, the decision partially favored the appellant's tax treatment, providing nuanced interpretation of statutory provisions.
ITAT allowed partial appeal regarding tax depreciation and expenditure deductions. The tribunal permitted depreciation on non-compete agreement payment as an intangible asset under Section 32(1)(ii), allowing the appellant's claim. Disallowance under Section 14A was set aside, finding the retrospective amendment inapplicable. Appeals related to rights issue expenditure and MAT credit were dismissed. The tribunal rejected disallowance of belated ESI and Labour Welfare Fund remittance, aligning with precedent judicial interpretation. Overall, the decision partially favored the appellant's tax treatment, providing nuanced interpretation of statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.