Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed partial appeal regarding tax depreciation and expenditure deductions. The tribunal permitted depreciation on non-compete agreement payment as an intangible asset under Section 32(1)(ii), allowing the appellant's claim. Disallowance under Section 14A was set aside, finding the retrospective amendment inapplicable. Appeals related to rights issue expenditure and MAT credit were dismissed. The tribunal rejected disallowance of belated ESI and Labour Welfare Fund remittance, aligning with precedent judicial interpretation. Overall, the decision partially favored the appellant's tax treatment, providing nuanced interpretation of statutory provisions.
ITAT allowed partial appeal regarding tax depreciation and expenditure deductions. The tribunal permitted depreciation on non-compete agreement payment as an intangible asset under Section 32(1)(ii), allowing the appellant's claim. Disallowance under Section 14A was set aside, finding the retrospective amendment inapplicable. Appeals related to rights issue expenditure and MAT credit were dismissed. The tribunal rejected disallowance of belated ESI and Labour Welfare Fund remittance, aligning with precedent judicial interpretation. Overall, the decision partially favored the appellant's tax treatment, providing nuanced interpretation of statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.