Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC allowed the petition under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, holding that the petitioner cannot be deprived of scheme benefits merely because the appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was not covered under Section 121(f) of the Finance Act. The court directed the Designated Committee to consider the petitioner's SVLDRS-1 application under Section 123(b), compute tax dues, grant relief under Section 124(1)(a), and issue the requisite form upon tax payment, thereby ensuring the petitioner's entitlement to the scheme's benefits for cess levied under the relevant Act.
The HC allowed the petition under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, holding that the petitioner cannot be deprived of scheme benefits merely because the appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was not covered under Section 121(f) of the Finance Act. The court directed the Designated Committee to consider the petitioner's SVLDRS-1 application under Section 123(b), compute tax dues, grant relief under Section 124(1)(a), and issue the requisite form upon tax payment, thereby ensuring the petitioner's entitlement to the scheme's benefits for cess levied under the relevant Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
