Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The HC allowed the petition under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, holding that the petitioner cannot be deprived of scheme benefits merely because the appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was not covered under Section 121(f) of the Finance Act. The court directed the Designated Committee to consider the petitioner's SVLDRS-1 application under Section 123(b), compute tax dues, grant relief under Section 124(1)(a), and issue the requisite form upon tax payment, thereby ensuring the petitioner's entitlement to the scheme's benefits for cess levied under the relevant Act.