Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC allowed the petition under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, holding that the petitioner cannot be deprived of scheme benefits merely because the appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was not covered under Section 121(f) of the Finance Act. The court directed the Designated Committee to consider the petitioner's SVLDRS-1 application under Section 123(b), compute tax dues, grant relief under Section 124(1)(a), and issue the requisite form upon tax payment, thereby ensuring the petitioner's entitlement to the scheme's benefits for cess levied under the relevant Act.
The HC allowed the petition under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, holding that the petitioner cannot be deprived of scheme benefits merely because the appeal filed before the Appellate Tribunal was not covered under Section 121(f) of the Finance Act. The court directed the Designated Committee to consider the petitioner's SVLDRS-1 application under Section 123(b), compute tax dues, grant relief under Section 124(1)(a), and issue the requisite form upon tax payment, thereby ensuring the petitioner's entitlement to the scheme's benefits for cess levied under the relevant Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
