Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
HC held that principles of natural justice were violated as petitioner was not provided adequate opportunity of hearing. The appeal's rejection under Section 107 of GST Act was deemed improper due to procedural unfairness. The appellate authority's order dated 19.03.2024 and tax determination order dated 08.02.2021 were set aside. Petitioner was directed to submit detailed explanation within six weeks, and the authority was mandated to complete further proceedings within two months of receiving the explanation. Petition allowed with specific procedural directives.
HC held that principles of natural justice were violated as petitioner was not provided adequate opportunity of hearing. The appeal's rejection under Section 107 of GST Act was deemed improper due to procedural unfairness. The appellate authority's order dated 19.03.2024 and tax determination order dated 08.02.2021 were set aside. Petitioner was directed to submit detailed explanation within six weeks, and the authority was mandated to complete further proceedings within two months of receiving the explanation. Petition allowed with specific procedural directives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
