Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate order and the order of determination of tax were liable to be set aside for want of proper opportunity of hearing and fair communication of notices under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax law.
Analysis: The petitioner's appeal had been rejected on limitation, but the challenge was founded on the absence of a fair opportunity to respond to the show cause notice and subsequent notices, which had been uploaded on the portal without effective intimation. The Court accepted that fair procedure requires reasonable notice to the taxpayer and that mere portal-uploading, without more, could not be treated as adequate in the circumstances. On that basis, the orders impugned were found vulnerable to interference.
Conclusion: The impugned appellate order and the order of tax determination were set aside, and the petitioner was directed to file a reply within six weeks, after which the authority was to proceed afresh in accordance with law.