Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the re-assessment order under section 147 r.w.s. 144B was invalid. The AO improperly reopened the minor son's income in the father's hands despite clear evidence that the income was already clubbed in the mother's income tax return. The tribunal found the reassessment proceedings procedurally flawed, as the AO failed to verify the submitted documentation and disregarded the assessee's explanation regarding income clubbing. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings, deleted the addition made by the AO, and allowed the assessee's appeal, emphasizing that the reassessment was contrary to legal provisions.
ITAT held that the re-assessment order under section 147 r.w.s. 144B was invalid. The AO improperly reopened the minor son's income in the father's hands despite clear evidence that the income was already clubbed in the mother's income tax return. The tribunal found the reassessment proceedings procedurally flawed, as the AO failed to verify the submitted documentation and disregarded the assessee's explanation regarding income clubbing. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings, deleted the addition made by the AO, and allowed the assessee's appeal, emphasizing that the reassessment was contrary to legal provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
