Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment and addition in the hands of the father could be sustained when the minor child's income was already clubbed in the hands of the mother.
Analysis: The return of income of the mother showed the minor child's income as having been clubbed in her hands. The assessee had consistently contended that the property transaction relatable to the minor child could not be reopened or assessed in the hands of the father. The reassessment was therefore examined on the footing that the notice and consequential addition had proceeded against a person who was not the correct assessee for the disputed income. On these facts, the reopening and the addition were held to be unsustainable in law.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue; the reassessment made in the father's hands and the resulting addition were deleted.