Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
