Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a preliminary, non-conclusive communication regarding a potential tax refund and not a statutory order. While quashing the impugned communication dated 16 June 2022, the court directed the tax authority to pass a final order determining the refund claim within eight weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, with all substantive contentions remaining open for consideration.
HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a preliminary, non-conclusive communication regarding a potential tax refund and not a statutory order. While quashing the impugned communication dated 16 June 2022, the court directed the tax authority to pass a final order determining the refund claim within eight weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, with all substantive contentions remaining open for consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
