Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
SC held that Respondent No. 1's appeal was time-barred under Section 61(2) of the IBC. The limitation period commenced on 07.04.2022 and expired on 07.05.2022, with a maximum statutory period of 45 days. The appeal was filed on 24.05.2022, beyond the prescribed and condonable periods. The NCLAT lacks jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the statutorily defined 30+15 days period. The court emphasized the IBC's strict procedural discipline, which mandates adherence to prescribed timelines to ensure efficient resolution of insolvency proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the tribunal's limited power to extend limitation periods.
SC held that Respondent No. 1's appeal was time-barred under Section 61(2) of the IBC. The limitation period commenced on 07.04.2022 and expired on 07.05.2022, with a maximum statutory period of 45 days. The appeal was filed on 24.05.2022, beyond the prescribed and condonable periods. The NCLAT lacks jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the statutorily defined 30+15 days period. The court emphasized the IBC's strict procedural discipline, which mandates adherence to prescribed timelines to ensure efficient resolution of insolvency proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the tribunal's limited power to extend limitation periods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
