https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88246 SC held that Respondent No. 1's appeal was time-barred under Section 61(2) of the IBC. The limitation period commenced on 07.04.2022 and expired on 07.05.2022, with a maximum statutory period of 45 days. The appeal was filed on 24.05.2022, beyond the prescribed and condonable periods. The NCLAT lacks jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the statutorily defined 30+15 days period. The court emphasized the IBC's strict procedural discipline, which mandates adherence to prescribed timelines to ensure efficient resolution of insolvency proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the tribunal's limited power to extend limitation periods. en-us Sat, 10 May 2025 08:36:36 +0530 Sat, 10 May 2025 08:37:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88246 SC held that Respondent No. 1's appeal was time-barred under Section 61(2) of the IBC. The limitation period commenced on 07.04.2022 and expired on 07.05.2022, with a maximum statutory period of 45 days. The appeal was filed on 24.05.2022, beyond the prescribed and condonable periods. The NCLAT lacks jurisdiction to condone delays beyond the statutorily defined 30+15 days period. The court emphasized the IBC's strict procedural discipline, which mandates adherence to prescribed timelines to ensure efficient resolution of insolvency proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the tribunal's limited power to extend limitation periods. Highlights IBC Sat, 10 May 2025 08:36:36 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88246