Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
SC held that courts have limited power to modify arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Modification is permissible only in specific circumstances: (i) when the award is severable, allowing separation of valid and invalid portions; (ii) correcting clerical, computational, or typographical errors; (iii) modifying post-award interest in certain cases; and (iv) applying Article 142 of the Constitution with extreme caution. The Court clarified that the power to set aside an award does not inherently include the power to modify, and modifications must be carefully circumscribed within statutory limitations.
SC held that courts have limited power to modify arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Modification is permissible only in specific circumstances: (i) when the award is severable, allowing separation of valid and invalid portions; (ii) correcting clerical, computational, or typographical errors; (iii) modifying post-award interest in certain cases; and (iv) applying Article 142 of the Constitution with extreme caution. The Court clarified that the power to set aside an award does not inherently include the power to modify, and modifications must be carefully circumscribed within statutory limitations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
