Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
SC held that courts have limited power to modify arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Modification is permissible only in specific circumstances: (i) when the award is severable, allowing separation of valid and invalid portions; (ii) correcting clerical, computational, or typographical errors; (iii) modifying post-award interest in certain cases; and (iv) applying Article 142 of the Constitution with extreme caution. The Court clarified that the power to set aside an award does not inherently include the power to modify, and modifications must be carefully circumscribed within statutory limitations.
SC held that courts have limited power to modify arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Modification is permissible only in specific circumstances: (i) when the award is severable, allowing separation of valid and invalid portions; (ii) correcting clerical, computational, or typographical errors; (iii) modifying post-award interest in certain cases; and (iv) applying Article 142 of the Constitution with extreme caution. The Court clarified that the power to set aside an award does not inherently include the power to modify, and modifications must be carefully circumscribed within statutory limitations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
