Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter back to the 3rd respondent for reconsideration. The court recognized the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme under Section 128(A) of CGST Act for tax years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. The decision emphasized that undisputed tax arrears cannot be demanded arbitrarily when express legal provisions exist under Section 75(12) of GST Acts. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to avail the benefits of the Amnesty Scheme, with directions to reconsider the matter in accordance with established legal principles.
HC allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter back to the 3rd respondent for reconsideration. The court recognized the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme under Section 128(A) of CGST Act for tax years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. The decision emphasized that undisputed tax arrears cannot be demanded arbitrarily when express legal provisions exist under Section 75(12) of GST Acts. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to avail the benefits of the Amnesty Scheme, with directions to reconsider the matter in accordance with established legal principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
