Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that under SARFAESI Act, the liability of mortgagor is distinct from the borrower in determining pre-deposit amount. The court clarified that when a borrower raises objections to a secured creditor's notice, the creditor's response can be considered in calculating the debt due. The statutory provisions mandate the secured creditor to consider and communicate responses to borrower representations. The court directed DRAT to reassess the pre-deposit amount by considering the petitioner's reply and bank's rejoinder, effectively quashing the previous order and allowing the petition in part.
HC held that under SARFAESI Act, the liability of mortgagor is distinct from the borrower in determining pre-deposit amount. The court clarified that when a borrower raises objections to a secured creditor's notice, the creditor's response can be considered in calculating the debt due. The statutory provisions mandate the secured creditor to consider and communicate responses to borrower representations. The court directed DRAT to reassess the pre-deposit amount by considering the petitioner's reply and bank's rejoinder, effectively quashing the previous order and allowing the petition in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.