Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that SEBI possesses unrestricted authority to terminate an Administrator's services. The petitioner, who served as Administrator for over three years from 31.05.2019, was validly relieved through communication dated 09.03.2022 without casting any stigma. The termination communication acknowledged the petitioner's efforts while confirming the non-permanent nature of the administrative appointment. The court directed SEBI to assess and determine the petitioner's remuneration within eight weeks, in accordance with the circular dated 02.04.2019, considering the graded payment mechanism based on asset sale proceeds. The petitioner's request to nullify the termination letter was deemed untenable.
HC held that SEBI possesses unrestricted authority to terminate an Administrator's services. The petitioner, who served as Administrator for over three years from 31.05.2019, was validly relieved through communication dated 09.03.2022 without casting any stigma. The termination communication acknowledged the petitioner's efforts while confirming the non-permanent nature of the administrative appointment. The court directed SEBI to assess and determine the petitioner's remuneration within eight weeks, in accordance with the circular dated 02.04.2019, considering the graded payment mechanism based on asset sale proceeds. The petitioner's request to nullify the termination letter was deemed untenable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.