Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC determined that initiating an investigation under Section 11-C of SEBI Act requires demonstrable reasonable grounds. The court found insufficient substantive evidence to warrant the investigation, as the appointing authority merely reiterated withdrawn allegations without comprehensive supporting documentation. Internal notings remained unapproved by the Executive Director, and no compelling circumstances justified a suo motu investigation. The order was deemed arbitrary and unreasonable, lacking the requisite legal threshold for initiating regulatory proceedings against the petitioner entity.
HC determined that initiating an investigation under Section 11-C of SEBI Act requires demonstrable reasonable grounds. The court found insufficient substantive evidence to warrant the investigation, as the appointing authority merely reiterated withdrawn allegations without comprehensive supporting documentation. Internal notings remained unapproved by the Executive Director, and no compelling circumstances justified a suo motu investigation. The order was deemed arbitrary and unreasonable, lacking the requisite legal threshold for initiating regulatory proceedings against the petitioner entity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
