Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT addressed an insolvency resolution case involving submission of resolution plans after recall of a previous approved plan. The Tribunal held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) was not obligated to issue a fresh Form-G or provide a mandatory 30-day period under Regulation 36B(3). The CoC validly established a timeline of 03.02.2025 for resolution plan submission, which applied equally to all Prospective Resolution Applicants. The Appellant failed to submit a resolution plan within the prescribed timeline. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting the Appellant's time extension application was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CoC's commercial discretion in managing the insolvency resolution process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.