Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT analyzed a complex insolvency resolution case involving an assignment agreement and Section 7 application. The Tribunal held that the assignment agreement is partially void regarding immovable property in Tamil Nadu under Section 28 of the Registration Act, but remains valid for other financial assets. The Section 7 application was deemed not time-barred due to continuous debt acknowledgment in balance sheets. The appellant's deposit of principal amount did not discharge the financial creditor's debt, as the amount was not reflective of the debt at the time of application. The Tribunal ultimately upheld the adjudicating authority's order admitting the Section 7 application and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
NCLAT analyzed a complex insolvency resolution case involving an assignment agreement and Section 7 application. The Tribunal held that the assignment agreement is partially void regarding immovable property in Tamil Nadu under Section 28 of the Registration Act, but remains valid for other financial assets. The Section 7 application was deemed not time-barred due to continuous debt acknowledgment in balance sheets. The appellant's deposit of principal amount did not discharge the financial creditor's debt, as the amount was not reflective of the debt at the time of application. The Tribunal ultimately upheld the adjudicating authority's order admitting the Section 7 application and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.