Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
NCLAT analyzed a complex insolvency resolution case involving an assignment agreement and Section 7 application. The Tribunal held that the assignment agreement is partially void regarding immovable property in Tamil Nadu under Section 28 of the Registration Act, but remains valid for other financial assets. The Section 7 application was deemed not time-barred due to continuous debt acknowledgment in balance sheets. The appellant's deposit of principal amount did not discharge the financial creditor's debt, as the amount was not reflective of the debt at the time of application. The Tribunal ultimately upheld the adjudicating authority's order admitting the Section 7 application and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
NCLAT analyzed a complex insolvency resolution case involving an assignment agreement and Section 7 application. The Tribunal held that the assignment agreement is partially void regarding immovable property in Tamil Nadu under Section 28 of the Registration Act, but remains valid for other financial assets. The Section 7 application was deemed not time-barred due to continuous debt acknowledgment in balance sheets. The appellant's deposit of principal amount did not discharge the financial creditor's debt, as the amount was not reflective of the debt at the time of application. The Tribunal ultimately upheld the adjudicating authority's order admitting the Section 7 application and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.