Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the Section 94 insolvency petition was a deliberate attempt to obstruct lawful recovery proceedings. The Appellant, as a personal guarantor, had acknowledged outstanding debt since 2012, made partial payments, and consistently used judicial processes to delay creditor's recovery rights. The Tribunal concluded the petition was not filed for genuine insolvency resolution but to strategically prevent enforcement of secured residential premises, thus constituting an abuse of legal process. The appeal was rejected, upholding the lower tribunal's findings and maintaining the creditor's right to recover outstanding dues.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the Section 94 insolvency petition was a deliberate attempt to obstruct lawful recovery proceedings. The Appellant, as a personal guarantor, had acknowledged outstanding debt since 2012, made partial payments, and consistently used judicial processes to delay creditor's recovery rights. The Tribunal concluded the petition was not filed for genuine insolvency resolution but to strategically prevent enforcement of secured residential premises, thus constituting an abuse of legal process. The appeal was rejected, upholding the lower tribunal's findings and maintaining the creditor's right to recover outstanding dues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.