Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the Section 94 insolvency petition was a deliberate attempt to obstruct lawful recovery proceedings. The Appellant, as a personal guarantor, had acknowledged outstanding debt since 2012, made partial payments, and consistently used judicial processes to delay creditor's recovery rights. The Tribunal concluded the petition was not filed for genuine insolvency resolution but to strategically prevent enforcement of secured residential premises, thus constituting an abuse of legal process. The appeal was rejected, upholding the lower tribunal's findings and maintaining the creditor's right to recover outstanding dues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.