Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the notice under Rule 5(2), as these provisions serve different purposes. The lack of a mandatory time limit for issuing the notice does not invalidate it. The court directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's appeal and stay application within two months, effectively dismissing the petitioner's challenge as premature given the pending appeal.
HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the notice under Rule 5(2), as these provisions serve different purposes. The lack of a mandatory time limit for issuing the notice does not invalidate it. The court directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's appeal and stay application within two months, effectively dismissing the petitioner's challenge as premature given the pending appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
