Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the notice under Rule 5(2), as these provisions serve different purposes. The lack of a mandatory time limit for issuing the notice does not invalidate it. The court directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's appeal and stay application within two months, effectively dismissing the petitioner's challenge as premature given the pending appeal.
HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the notice under Rule 5(2), as these provisions serve different purposes. The lack of a mandatory time limit for issuing the notice does not invalidate it. The court directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's appeal and stay application within two months, effectively dismissing the petitioner's challenge as premature given the pending appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
