Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed the petition challenging tax authorities' rejection of revised income tax return. The court found that the petitioner received land acquisition compensation after the original return filing, which prevented timely disclosure. The authorities failed to consider the compensation was tax-exempt and the petitioner was legitimately prevented from including it in the original return. The HC quashed the previous order and directed tax authorities to condone the delay in filing the revised return and process it in accordance with law, ensuring the petitioner can claim TDS refund.
HC allowed the petition challenging tax authorities' rejection of revised income tax return. The court found that the petitioner received land acquisition compensation after the original return filing, which prevented timely disclosure. The authorities failed to consider the compensation was tax-exempt and the petitioner was legitimately prevented from including it in the original return. The HC quashed the previous order and directed tax authorities to condone the delay in filing the revised return and process it in accordance with law, ensuring the petitioner can claim TDS refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.