Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in filing the revised return to claim refund of TDS deducted on compensation received for compulsory acquisition of land was liable to be condoned under section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The compensation was received only after the due date for filing the return, and the petitioner could not reflect the amount in the original return because the share in the compensation had not been determined earlier. The claim for refund arose from tax deducted on compensation that was treated as not taxable, and the power under section 119(2)(b) is intended to avoid genuine hardship and to enable admission of delayed claims for refund where the assessee is otherwise entitled to relief. The material on record showed that the delay was not attributable to the petitioner in a manner that would justify refusal of condonation.
Conclusion: The delay was required to be condoned and the application rejecting condonation was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the authority was directed to pass a fresh order condoning the delay so that the revised return and refund claim could be processed in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a refund claim arises only after receipt of compensation for compulsory acquisition and the assessee was prevented by circumstances beyond control from including it in the original return, section 119(2)(b) must be applied to remove genuine hardship by permitting delayed filing for refund.