Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
HC upheld the Ministry of Labour and Employment's notification prohibiting contract labour at Central Warehousing Corporation's Inland Clearance Depot. The court found the work was perennial, necessary for the enterprise, and sufficiently substantial to employ full-time workers. The CACLB's analysis demonstrated proper application of mind under Section 10(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. Specifically, the consistent deployment of approximately 300 contractual labourers over 18 years and similar work performed by regular employees at comparable establishments substantiated the prohibition. The impugned notification was consequently validated, and the petition was disposed of.
HC upheld the Ministry of Labour and Employment's notification prohibiting contract labour at Central Warehousing Corporation's Inland Clearance Depot. The court found the work was perennial, necessary for the enterprise, and sufficiently substantial to employ full-time workers. The CACLB's analysis demonstrated proper application of mind under Section 10(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. Specifically, the consistent deployment of approximately 300 contractual labourers over 18 years and similar work performed by regular employees at comparable establishments substantiated the prohibition. The impugned notification was consequently validated, and the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
