Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of HC upheld the Ministry of Labour and Employment's notification prohibiting contract labour at Central Warehousing Corporation's Inland Clearance Depot. The court found the work was perennial, necessary for the enterprise, and sufficiently substantial to employ full-time workers. The CACLB's analysis demonstrated proper application of mind under Section 10(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. Specifically, the consistent deployment of approximately 300 contractual labourers over 18 years and similar work performed by regular employees at comparable establishments substantiated the prohibition. The impugned notification was consequently validated, and the petition was disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
