Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor's account during moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC. The appellants demonstrated persistent non-cooperation and brazen disobedience of prior orders. The tribunal held that the withdrawal violated IBC provisions, rendering the suspended directors liable to deposit the entire amount with 12% per annum interest into the liquidation estate. The appeal was summarily dismissed as lacking substantive legal merit, with the order becoming final due to non-challenge of previous judicial determinations.
NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor's account during moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC. The appellants demonstrated persistent non-cooperation and brazen disobedience of prior orders. The tribunal held that the withdrawal violated IBC provisions, rendering the suspended directors liable to deposit the entire amount with 12% per annum interest into the liquidation estate. The appeal was summarily dismissed as lacking substantive legal merit, with the order becoming final due to non-challenge of previous judicial determinations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.