<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate Directors Illegally Withdraw Funds During Insolvency Moratorium, Ordered to Repay Full Amount with Interest</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87791</link>
    <description>NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal&#039;s order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor&#039;s account during moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC. The appellants demonstrated persistent non-cooperation and brazen disobedience of prior orders. The tribunal held that the withdrawal violated IBC provisions, rendering the suspended directors liable to deposit the entire amount with 12% per annum interest into the liquidation estate. The appeal was summarily dismissed as lacking substantive legal merit, with the order becoming final due to non-challenge of previous judicial determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Directors Illegally Withdraw Funds During Insolvency Moratorium, Ordered to Repay Full Amount with Interest</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87791</link>
      <description>NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal&#039;s order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor&#039;s account during moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC. The appellants demonstrated persistent non-cooperation and brazen disobedience of prior orders. The tribunal held that the withdrawal violated IBC provisions, rendering the suspended directors liable to deposit the entire amount with 12% per annum interest into the liquidation estate. The appeal was summarily dismissed as lacking substantive legal merit, with the order becoming final due to non-challenge of previous judicial determinations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:30:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>