Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor's account during moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC. The appellants demonstrated persistent non-cooperation and brazen disobedience of prior orders. The tribunal held that the withdrawal violated IBC provisions, rendering the suspended directors liable to deposit the entire amount with 12% per annum interest into the liquidation estate. The appeal was summarily dismissed as lacking substantive legal merit, with the order becoming final due to non-challenge of previous judicial determinations.
NCLAT affirmed the lower tribunal's order regarding unauthorized withdrawal of Rs. 32 lakhs from corporate debtor's account during moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC. The appellants demonstrated persistent non-cooperation and brazen disobedience of prior orders. The tribunal held that the withdrawal violated IBC provisions, rendering the suspended directors liable to deposit the entire amount with 12% per annum interest into the liquidation estate. The appeal was summarily dismissed as lacking substantive legal merit, with the order becoming final due to non-challenge of previous judicial determinations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
